Current:Home > MarketsA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -GrowthProspect
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:47:06
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (1447)
Related
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Ozempic side effects could lead to hospitalization — and doctors warn that long-term impacts remain unknown
- Treat Mom to Kate Spade Bags, Jewelry & More With These Can't-Miss Mother's Day Deals
- Trump Wants to Erase Protections in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, a Storehouse of Carbon
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Kellie Pickler’s Husband Kyle Jacobs' Cause of Death Confirmed by Autopsy
- Warren Buffett Faces Pressure to Invest for the Climate, Not Just for Profit
- Aide Walt Nauta also indicted in documents case against Trump
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Antarctica Ice Loss Tripled in 5 Years, and That’s Raising Sea Level Risks
Ranking
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Russian state media says U.S. citizen has been detained on drug charges
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $360 Tote Bag for Just $79
- George Santos files appeal to keep names of those who helped post $500,000 bond sealed
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Victoria's Secret Model Josephine Skriver Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Husband Alexander DeLeon
- 20 teens injured when Texas beach boardwalk collapses
- Don't Let These 60% Off Good American Deals Sell Out Before You Can Add Them to Your Cart
Recommendation
What to watch: O Jolie night
Texas Officials Have Photos of Flood-Related Oil Spills, but No Record of Any Response
Warren Buffett Faces Pressure to Invest for the Climate, Not Just for Profit
Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes' GMA3 Replacements Revealed
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
More than 1 billion young people could be at risk of hearing loss, a new study shows
'The Long COVID Survival Guide' to finding care and community
This is America's most common text-messaging scam, FTC says